TA and Bruce Lee

[theng]

8TV start a new TV video series of Bruce Lee story months ago. Bruce Lee said :Chinese " Kung Fu " have too many "pie"  and each of the "Pie" kung fu have also many style and pattern which is not necessary in that art why not take it away just go straight to the point so he create his Jeet Kune Do.

Now let look at charting TA I think have many "pie" too and many style and pattern too. Now let think why will have so many style pattern ? so many type of indicators so many type of trading system ? just like chinese kung fu is all because of one found that the system , pattern or indicators he know cannot forecast the market movement so create a system he feel is good for him, so time go on more and more indicators and pattern in "TA world" .

So why not make it simple just fix in a few type of style or indicators.

now BRUCE LEE he is my sifu too. any way most of the time I don't like to use too many indicators too, now will try to make it more simple.         

[Maxforce]

Very true.
For me, I found that gambling and trading is the same.
Now Genting is my sifu.

[theng]

Very true.
For me, I found that gambling and trading is the same.

Yep agree to your point but not really the same, gamble both party have no clue(if not cheating) but in stock , future trade we can get some clue, we make a wrong trade mean we didn't get the clue or get it wrong.   

[Maxforce]

Very true.
For me, I found that gambling and trading is the same.

Yep agree to your point but not really the same, gamble both party have no clue(if not cheating) but in stock , future trade we can get some clue, we make a wrong trade mean we didn't get the clue or get it wrong.   

I found that in gambling, we can also do charting and that provide clue same as stock/futures.
But what I do not understand is why does trend exist in gambling? Or trend exist in everything???

[theng]

Very true.
For me, I found that gambling and trading is the same.

Yep agree to your point but not really the same, gamble both party have no clue(if not cheating) but in stock , future trade we can get some clue, we make a wrong trade mean we didn't get the clue or get it wrong.   

I found that in gambling, we can also do charting and that provide clue same as stock/futures.
But what I do not understand is why does trend exist in gambling? Or trend exist in everything???

Noting to be understand or not understand, for me every thing are in nature when got high sure got low just like no one can answer first to have egg in this world or chicken come first?
Just like the hexagram in I-Ching all are binary code and in sequence, this was create by ancient Chinese thousand yrs ago, now we are using it in our computer and digital. So this is another item we cannot understand, what I can understand is ancient chinese are smart they create many thing which we are using now.         

[smallcap]

Maxforce, your "Now Genting is my sifu." make me laugh like hell lah.

Einstein's theory mah, there must hv Low when there is a High; when someone is earning which also mean someone is losing...etc.

I also believed everything have their own trend or cycle. Ppl said bcos Earth is round, so the beginning = ending as well. For example u c our mobile phone now, first was "big brother big", after that manufacturers made the revolution to upgraded to slim and thin type. And now after built-in GPS, Mobile TV, Games, Online, Broadcast, Camera those functions, slowly become bigger again

Time to get back to work, haha...

[Maxforce]

 
Glad I provide some entertainment value
 

Back to Nature then

[Doom]

Gambling got no trend i think mainly bcos, the result is pure random factor. Trading got  trend because it's influence by human (supply and demand + emotional)

When bullist many people long and buy shares, so the price is push up. In gambling, how many ppl buy BIG or SMALL also same.  Unless you play blackjack or horse betting, blackjack you can influence the result, horse betting you can influence the rate (even can influence the result)

Bruce Lee have his point, to make it simple cos his objective is just to hit the enemy.  In trading is very difficult, you need alot of indicator because market have stages, as times change indicator might not be as accurate as before, so with more indicator means more accurate.  I think it really depends what type of trade you wanna be. 90% accuracy trader (need more indicator), or u just purely wanna make money end of the day (long run). 

[Maxforce]

If Nature has its hand then perhaps there is an influence.
Just like when its time for the tide to rise, it will rise - thereby creating a trend of rising water
When its time for the tide to recede, the trend of the water level would be downward.
Influence from human? None...
Purely random? Hardly so...

[theng]

If Nature has its hand

Well nature really has its hand! why most of the Muslim country got oil? who can answer this ?Trend mean trend
don't care human make or nature.

To success in trading depend on 2 thing luck and knowledge, we do not need knowledge if we have luck. we can have alot of knowledge but we don't have luck we still cannot make money. If we have luck + knowledge mean can make lot of money. some time to learn a knowledge also depend on luck, I m good luck in TA cos I met a good  sifu, same like Bruce Lee got a good sifu.

If one have lot of knowledge but don't know how to make use of it or make wrong use of it also a waste.
like Bruce Lee he know many type of art in kungfu  but he make it simple. Bruce Lee he learn when people tell him some thing he try to find out or pock only some useful part this is how he learn.

This days I found some thing in fkli too it make me have another way of analysis on fkli. this have to thank Doom without him I have no way to know it. and I found another  TA method too using some thing may be better than what I know this have to thank itan give me an idea of what to use.   

[theng]

Bruce Lee said This world have no perfect human so mean no perfect kungfu , there are only more better kungfu
just can try to make it better.TA are the same too there are no perfect tool or perfect system so we can only learn to be more better than what we know now.